OLD Wilkinson Ratings
Right this is the original page with all my Wlkinson ratings for my warriors.
OK in an effort to kickstart a standard warrior rating system I have adopted
the Wilkinson Benchmark to rate all my warriors. Here are all the warriors now
sorted accoding to their score, plus some comparisons with common warriors to
show just how mine compare. Also I'm going to rate warriors which I haven't
released yet so that people can see how they compare here.
- 132.8 Extreme Prejudice
- 130.1 Hyakutake Zenith
- 129.6 Hyakutake C/1996 B2 +
- 127.8 Hyakutake C/1996 B2
- 126.5 Hyakutake Perihelion
- 121.7 You Wouldn't Let It Lie!
- 121.5 Judge Nutmeg
- 119.4 You Wouldn't Let It Lie! 1.01
- 115.9 Uvavu II revisited
- 115.8 Uvavu II
- 112.0 Hyakutake Rising
- 109.1 Hyakutake Approaches
- 107.7 Uvavu P!
- 106.8 Hint Test V.4 (from Core Warrior #6)
- 91.6 Cyclone
- 81.3 Hyakutake Engine
- 79.0 Uvavu V1.01
- 72.0 Enlightenment
- 70.8 Uvavu
- 61.3 Enlightenment II
- 58.2 Eranu V1.02
- 58.1 Eranu v1.03
- 54.4 Deathwalker
- 53.8 Deathwalker II
- 52.0 A. K. Dewdney's Dwarf
- 51.2 Uvavu 40(TNG)
- 49.5 Mutagen
- 48.7 Uvavu 60(TNG)
- 47.7 Uvavu 76(TNG)
- 44.1 Uvavu (original)
- 43.6 Uvavu 20(TNG)
- 8.0 Wait......
The benchmark warriors are available from Planar's archive, and the rating
process I have used is simply 200 battles with each warrior and a self battle
the scores are then scaled to 100 battles (i.e 0-300).
Only 2600 battles is probably too small to justify the precision I have used
in the ratings, but when I get time I will run more tests to increase the
So now the question is how the benchmary can be improved, there are only
12 warriors, probably too small for an accurate benchmark, also should
the number of round be altered and should we include self fights.
And what do we call the rating, Wilks, Wilkies, Wilkstones.....